You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Congratulations for this amazing repository. I think meteostat could be greatly improved if model data is provided by default if no nearby station is found for a given data point. This happens to me trying to find data in southern Spain as stations are really scarce in some areas there. As this scenario may appear frequently in certain areas, this new feature could be really cool to add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
However, we'd need to change the way Meteostat works to achieve that. Currently, model data is specifically stored and retrieved only for the locations where a weather station is installed.
Maybe we can set up a grid (e.g. 5 * 5 km) and provide model-based time series for each grid cell. Then, if there are no stations nearby or gaps in the series, we fall back to the closest grid cell.
Biggest challenge would certainly be the amount of data. If we want to have a reasonable resolution, we'll end up with millions of grid cells. I doubt this is feasible without bigger funding. But I agree it would improve data availability in remote areas (or those with few stations).
Hi!
Congratulations for this amazing repository. I think meteostat could be greatly improved if model data is provided by default if no nearby station is found for a given data point. This happens to me trying to find data in southern Spain as stations are really scarce in some areas there. As this scenario may appear frequently in certain areas, this new feature could be really cool to add.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: